Skip to content
Comparisons

How Supaorder Compares — Sourced, Dated, and Honest About the Losses

Side-by-side comparisons against the platforms restaurants actually shortlist us against, across 14 criteria. Every competitor figure is quoted from their own website and linked.

Pick a Platform

Supaorder vs the Alternatives

Supaorder vs ChowNow

ChowNow keeps the subscription low and charges for the volume — 2.95% + $0.29 on every transaction, a setup fee, and a per-order rate on delivery. Supaorder charges one flat price per location and nothing per order, and puts the register, kitchen screen and kiosk in the same subscription.

Read the comparison

Supaorder vs Flipdish

Flipdish and Supaorder sell the same shape of product. The difference is what each one tells you before you talk to sales: Flipdish publishes subscription prices but no transaction rate, and prices the app tier and the kiosk as separate subscriptions. Supaorder publishes one per-location price with the app, POS, kitchen screen and kiosk inside it, and charges nothing per order.

Read the comparison

Supaorder vs UpMenu

UpMenu's plans are cheap because the plan is the ordering website. The branded app, the driver app, loyalty, delivery services and marketplace integrations are each a separate monthly add-on, and the two lower plans cap orders and charge $1.90 for each one past the cap. Supaorder puts all of it in one per-location price with no cap.

Read the comparison

Supaorder vs Restolabs

Restolabs and Supaorder agree on the important thing — no commission on your orders. They disagree on scope. Restolabs stops at the order; Supaorder carries it through the register, the kitchen screen, the kiosk and the driver.

Read the comparison

Supaorder vs Fleksa

Fleksa is the only platform on these pages that publishes an actual commission rate: its zero-monthly plan takes 8% of ordering revenue. Its paid tiers are commission-free, with onboarding starting at 299 per product group. Supaorder has one flat per-location price and no commission tier at all.

Read the comparison

Moving off GloriaFood

GloriaFood’s ordering service shuts down on 30 April 2027 and there is no export tool. A migration guide rather than a comparison — what changes, and how to move before the deadline.

Read the migration guide
Our Method

How We Write These

Comparison pages published by a vendor are usually worth nothing, because the vendor wrote every row. These are the rules that make ours worth reading.

Vendor-published facts only

Every competitor cell comes from that vendor’s own pricing or features page. No review-site figures, no analyst estimates, no numbers a salesperson told us.

“Not published” is not “doesn’t have it”

Where a vendor publishes nothing on a criterion, we say so. A missing page is not a missing feature, and we would rather record uncertainty than invent a gap.

Dated, and re-checked quarterly

Each page shows when its competitor column was last read from source — currently 21 August 2026 — and links the exact pages, so a stale row is visibly stale.

Every page names where they win

Each comparison has a section on when the other platform is the better buy, written to be useful rather than grudging. Some rows in the tables go against us.

Found a row that no longer matches what a vendor publishes? Tell us at [email protected] and we will correct it. Every platform named here is a trademark of its respective owner, and none of these comparisons is endorsed by them.

Ready to Keep 100% of Your Revenue?

Get your own branded ordering platform. Live in as little as 48 hours — zero commission, no contracts.

Book a live demo on a real store · Free setup for early customers